Last November, the American Chemical Society (ACS) won its lawsuit against Sci-Hub, a popular pirate site for academic papers. Since then, a number of Sci-Hub’s domains have been suspended, and earlier this month, Cloudflare, a web performance and security company, terminated its service to the site. Even with these problems, some researchers predict that Sci-Hub will continue rising in popularity as it has over the last few years.
Logs of publication downloads from 2017, released by Sci-Hub on January 18, show that, despite the lawsuits from ACS and Elsevier, the site experienced a growth in activity. An analysis of those data, published earlier this month in eLife, reveals that daily downloads on the pirate site steadily increased from approximately 200,000 per day in 2016 to around 600,000 per day by mid-2017.
Last December, however, downloads dropped significantly—to approximately 350,000 per day—around the time that Sci-Hub lost three of its domains, sci-hub.cc, sci-hub.io, and sci-hub.ac.
See “American Chemical Society Wins Lawsuit Against Sci-Hub”
“This is not fully surprising,” study coauthor Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, a data scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and director of research for the Open Humans Foundation, a platform for storing and sharing personal information online, writes in an email to The Scientist. A similar thing occurred in November 2015, he notes, when Sci-Hub’s primary domain at the time, sci-hub.org, was shut down following a court order that emerged from Elsevier’s lawsuit against the site for unlawfully disseminating its copyrighted content.
“In the past Sci-Hub has recovered from all tries to hit its IT infrastructure and, if anything, the lawsuits against Sci-Hub have brought more interest and media attention to [it],” Tzovaras writes. “I predict that the same thing will happen now.”
According to Doug Kramer, general counsel for Cloudflare, the company terminated its services to Sci-Hub after receiving a copy of the court order from ACS’s attorneys. The order, issued by US District Judge Leonie Brinkema last year, required organizations—including domain name registries, search engines, and Internet service providers—that were in “active concert or participation” with the site to censor it.
Although Kramer wouldn’t go into the specifics about how this would affect Sci-Hub, he explained that, in general, Cloudflare provides “a range of optimization and cybersecurity services.” Because the company doesn’t host websites, “if all we do is shut off our service, the information is still on the host [and] users could still access that information,” Kramer explains. “They just wouldn’t be accessing it through Cloudflare’s screening process.”
“ACS is pleased that the rule of law prevails over piracy and theft of legally protected materials,” Glenn Ruskin, the director of ACS External Affairs and Communications, writes in an emailed statement to The Scientist. “Our sole intent continues to be [to] protect the legal rights of ACS by forcing Sci-Hub to cease its illegal activities and comply with the law.”
While it is not entirely clear how losing Cloudflare’s services will affect Sci-Hub’s operations (Alexandra Elbakyan, the site’s founder, did not respond to requests for comment), when Sci-Hub announced the news over Twitter earlier this month, it added that it “is not critical but may cause a short pause in website operation.”
See “Publishers’ Legal Action Advances Against Sci-Hub”
According to the recent eLife study, as of March 2017, Sci-Hub’s database contained 85.1 percent of the all the scholarly articles published in paywalled journals—more than that available at the University of Pennsylvania. “It’s pretty amazing because a lot of people assume that if you’re at a university, you have access to all the literature, and that’s not really true,” says study coauthor Daniel Himmelstein, a biodata scientist and postdoc at the University of Pennsylvania. “In fact, the pirate tool has access to more.”
Although some users have reported issues with Sci-Hub’s currently available domains on social media, a number of them are still active and accessible. “Sci-Hubs’ popularity has been steadily growing. And this is not only despite these lawsuits but also because of them,” Tzovaras writes. “I think if the publishers want to fight back against Sci-Hub they will have to do so outside the courtroom.”
RSS